POST 32 THOUGHTS ON GOVERNMENT

5 min.

Blueprint for a Balanced Republic

John Adams was a man of extraordinary insights. In a visionary assessment he wrote, “Soon after the Reformation, a few people came over into this New World for conscience sake. Perhaps this apparently trivial incident may transfer the great seat of empire to America…” He was also convinced that reconciliation was impossible; that the crisis with England would never be settled peaceably.

Adams saw the moment as providential — a rare opportunity for mankind to choose a new form of government based on reason, virtue, and the rights of man. Upon his return to Philadelphia in February 1776, he drew up a list of what he was determined to see accomplished. Independence was the only chance at American liberty, and he was determined that the great step be taken. The only question was when to make the move. Across the top of a page in his diary, he titled his work A Declaration of Independency.

With the delegates equally divided among opposition, caution, and independence, the Continental Congress was strained and the mood of Philadelphia contentious. When word arrived that Parliament had denounced as traitors all Americans who did not make an unconditional submission to British rule, the punishment, as every delegate knew, would be death by hanging. Having been advised early on by Dr. Benjamin Rush that they were perceived as “too zealous” and that they must defer to the “very proud” Virginians, who felt they had the right to lead, the New Englanders bided their time while holding firm for independence.

There were times on the debate floor when the arguments reached fever pitch. The “cool faction,” driven by pacifist Quakerism, continued to support peaceful methods for resolving the crisis. In the words of George Washington, these were those “still feeding themselves upon the dainty food of reconciliation.” In the heat of the moment this group, led by John Dickinson, even threatened to break off from the others and “carry on the opposition by ourselves in our own way.”

As to his feelings regarding half measures, Adams wrote to General Horatio Gates: “The middle way is no way at all. If we finally fail in this great and glorious contest, it will be by bewildering ourselves in groping for the middle way.”

What neither Dickinson nor Adams nor anyone could have anticipated was the stunning effect of Common Sense…a call to arms, an unabashed argument for war, and a call for American independence. “Everything that is right or reasonable pleads for separation,” wrote Thomas Paine. Though agreeing with Paine that the time was ripe for revolution Adams saw no quick victory, nor did he concur with what he labeled as Paine’s “feeble” understanding of the kind of government (a unicameral legislature) that should be established once independence was achieved.

“The happiness of the people was the purpose of government,” Adams wrote, “and therefore that form of government was best which produced the greatest amount of happiness for the largest number. And since all sober inquirers after truth agreed that happiness derived from virtue, that form of government with virtue as its foundation was more likely than any other to promote the general happiness.

“The greatest minds agreed,” Adams continued, “that all good government was republican, and the true idea of a republic was ‘an empire of laws and not of men.’ A government with a single legislative body would never do. Essential to the stability of government and to an able and impartial administration of justice, was separation of judicial power from both the legislative and executive.” Urging the widest possible support for education, he added: “Laws for the liberal education of youth are extremely wise and useful.”

John Adams’ ideas spread quickly. Upon request, he gave a copy of “Thoughts” to George Wythe, America’s first law professor, dean of the Virginia bar, and Thomas Jefferson’s patron. In the months that followed, driven by expression of popular will, the power of the ardent revolutionaries increased as the conservative and moderate elements lost credibility through their dogged opposition to independence.

In the development of his own views, Thomas Jefferson had been more cautious than Adams, due in major part to Virginia’s dependence on English creditors and the lure of aristocratic life. Now, however, upon his arrival in Philadelphia, his commitment was no less than Adams’ own. In their devotion to the common cause of America, both men joined with others who craved independence and viewed themselves as participants at a crucial juncture of history.

On June 7, in Independence Hall, Richard Henry Lee, following three days of fierce debate, introduced the process that would turn the world upside down: “Resolved: That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States.”

Jefferson was the protege, Adams the mentor. On June 10, the Committee of Five, consisting of Jefferson, Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, and Benjamin Franklin, was appointed to prepare a declaration of independence. Valuing Jefferson’s literary talents and recognizing the political advantage in having the declaration written by a Virginian, Adams considered Jefferson the best choice for the task.

website: americasgranddesign.com

blog: http://www.americasgrand.design

Post 3 — The Foundations of American Freedom

3 min.

Truths That Anchor a Free People

If Providence guides history, then the American Founding must be understood not merely as a political achievement but as a moral moment. The Founders believed that certain truths were not invented but revealed—truths that form the bedrock of human dignity and the architecture of liberty. These truths shaped the Declaration of Independence and continue to shape the American conscience.

Sacred, Undeniable, and Self‑Evident

Thomas Jefferson originally described these truths as “sacred and undeniable.” Benjamin Franklin’s revision to self‑evident did not diminish their divine origin; it broadened their reach. It signaled that moral truth is accessible to reason, conscience, and experience—that it is written not only in scripture but in the human heart.

This shift helped secure the Declaration’s adoption. It also anchored the nation’s moral compass. America’s founding truths are not sectarian claims. They are universal principles grounded in both revelation and reason.

Natural Law: The Moral Structure of Creation

The Founders understood that a free society must rest on something deeper than preference or power. They turned to natural law—the belief that moral truth is woven into the fabric of creation. Natural law teaches that:

  • human dignity is inherent
  • rights are divine in origin
  • justice is not arbitrary
  • liberty requires virtue

These principles set limits on what any government may claim over the human soul. They also provided the philosophical foundation for the American experiment.

Providence in the Founding Moment

Again and again, the Founders spoke of Providence, a Superintending Influence, the Father of Lights. They saw improbable victories, moments of unity, and flashes of moral clarity as signs that history was being guided toward a new chapter. Freedom, in their view, was both a divine gift and a solemn responsibility.

They believed that God had prepared the world—through scripture, through reason, through centuries of struggle, through those who came before—for a nation built on moral truth. And they believed they were instruments in that preparation.

The ideas that shaped the Founding are not relics. They remain the conditions under which liberty can survive. When a people forget the truths that made them free, they risk losing the freedom those truths once secured.

Recovering these foundations is not nostalgia. It is necessity.

A nation that remembers its moral origins can renew its moral purpose. A nation that forgets them drifts toward confusion, division, and decay. America is part of a larger story. She is a nation shaped by natural rights, religious liberty, and the dignity of the individual; a nation with a cause. As Jefferson envisioned, she is an empire of liberty.

Where This Series Goes Next

This series now turns to the deeper roots of American liberty:

  • order, the first need of all
  • the Law and the Prophets
  • the meaning of natural law
  • the moral logic behind the consent of the governed
  • the ancient traditions that shaped the American mind

By returning to these sources, we reclaim more than historical insight. We recover the principles that once formed a free people—and can form us again.

Looking Ahead to Post 4

website: http://www.americasgranddesign.com

blog: americasgrand.design

SERIES INTRODUCTION

Providential Orchestration and the American Founding

Post No. 1

3 min

For generations, Americans have spoken of the founding era with a sense of awe—sometimes even reverence. Many of the Founders themselves described the events they lived through as “miraculous,” guided by a hand greater than their own. Yet modern historical writing often emphasizes uncertainty, chance, and human limitation. Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Jon Meacham notes that “nothing was foreordained about the American experiment,” while Walter Isaacson describes the revolutionaries’ sense of spiritual support as a kind of haze surrounding their efforts.

I understand why many scholars hesitate to speak of divine causation. Academic history prizes neutrality, and theological claims can feel out of place in that setting. But neutrality does not require us to ignore what the Founders said, what they believed, or how remarkably their independent choices converged toward a coherent outcome. If we take their words seriously—and if we examine the patterns of contingency and convergence with care—then the possibility of providential orchestration deserves thoughtful consideration.

That is the purpose of this 60‑day series.

Why This Series Matters

As we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, we have an opportunity not only to remember events but to reflect on meaning. The American founding was not a straight line. It was a tapestry woven from uncertainty, courage, conflict, and conviction. And yet, again and again, circumstances aligned in ways that seemed improbable—sometimes astonishing—to those who lived through them.

My aim is not to preach, but to persuade. Not to insist, but to invite. Not to simplify, but to illuminate.

Across the coming posts, I will explore:

  • Contingency — the real alternatives that could have changed everything
  • Primary voices — what the Founders and their contemporaries actually said
  • Convergences — the surprising alignments that shaped the nation’s birth
  • Providence — the possibility that these alignments were not accidental

If the evidence holds together, the argument will stand on its own merits.

A Journey Told One Day at a Time

This series is designed to unfold gradually—one post every day or two—so that readers can walk through the American founding step by step. Each entry will connect another dot, reveal another convergence, or highlight another moment when events seemed to bend toward a larger purpose. You are warmly invited to follow along.

Visit the blog or listen to the podcast regularly. Share it with others who love history, faith, or the American story. Reflect on what these patterns might suggest about our nation’s origin, purpose, and destiny.

Author: Brent Russell

Email: bruss1@comcast.net

Website: www.americansgranddesign.com

Blog: americasgrand.design

Subscribe:

All Men Are Created Equal

A Rebuke to Tyranny and Oppression

When considered in light of the most common charge leveled against America’s Founding Fathers, and against our nation itself, that they were hypocrites who did not believe in their stated principles, and therefore the country they built rests on a lie, two of the leading theological doctrines of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, properly understood and taught, would have significant impact on our culture. These teachings would refute the machinations of politics and selfish human interests, as well as undo the destructive theories that continue to divide Americans and tear at the fabric of our country.

First, is the powerful teaching of premortal life. Simply stated, man was in the beginning with God.

More specifically, in the premortal realm, order, agency, and eternal truths prevailed. Setting themselves apart through faithfulness, diligence, and devotion, leaders, including those who would discover, colonize, and establish the American nation, emerged. Born when and where they would be needed the most, these faithful individuals would be called upon to assist God in the development and progress of His work on earth.

Demonstrating the pattern of heaven, these noble and great souls would come forth as ancient philosophers, pagan or Israelite, as well as the great characters of modern times. In renewal, invention, translation, reform, discovery, science, enlightenment, music, colonization, the struggle for freedom, emancipation, union, statesmanship, diplomacy, religious ideals and philosophy, educational pursuits, and innovations, they would find in Christ the keys to human advancement and the source of the marvelous truths they would advocate.

Contrary to the greatest acts of mighty men, which have been carried out to depopulate nations and to overthrow kingdoms at the expense of the lives of the innocent, the blood of the oppressed, the moans of the widow, and the tears of the orphan, these noble and great ones would be inspired in doing what they do for the amelioration, liberty, and advancement of the human race. Unfolding under the umbrella of divine design, their leadership and accomplishments would be progressively refined to correspond with human understanding of God’s intentions.

Second, the inspiring assertion that our founding documents, and our nation itself, were created by the hands of wise men who were prepared in the premortal realm for that very task and raised up by God in mortality for that very purpose. Moreover, upon the foundation of the existential nature of freedom, over the course of centuries, God would employ a wide variety of methods and individuals to prepare the way and assist His chosen servants in the creation of this nation.

In 1620, upon boarding the Mayflower, the Pilgrims were worried about how self-government might be established upon their arrival in America. Somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, in one of the most significant acts in history, they drew up the Mayflower Compact.

Drawing heavily on the Long Letter, which had been presented by their spiritual leader, John Robinson, in Holland, the Mayflower Compact spelled out ideas for the group’s legal and social organization in the New World. For the role it played in inspiring this document, John Adams would credit Robinson’s Long Letter as foundational to the United States Constitution.

The aim of the Pilgrim enterprise, undertaken to escape religious persecution in the Old World and to seek the opportunity for self-government in the new one, was underscored by their belief that the Renaissance and Reformation were not ends but means to greater light. And even though God had not revealed His whole will to them, they knew they wanted to “be as a city upon a hill, [for] the eyes of all people are upon us” (John Winthrop).

In 1687, our notion of the structure of the natural world expanded dramatically with Isaac Newton’s discovery of gravity. The concept of a higher law, divinely ordained, was strengthened.

If Newton had been able to discern the particular laws that God had established to govern the movements of the planets in the heavens, how much more certain it was that He had ordained such laws for the direction of human societies. Accordingly, acting on John Locke’s assertion that the natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and that ordinary individuals could form new communities and governments simply by agreeing to do so, confident of the fact that their rights were guaranteed by God Himself, the Founding Fathers would source human rights to the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.

Having gained a foothold in the New World, the parade of great and noble souls in pursuit of God’s will, continued to unfold. With a collective yearning for divine and practical guidance in an era of constitutional thinking, colonial America was richly blessed by the influence of George Whitefield, Jonathan Edwards, Cotton Mather, John Wesley, and James Otis.

In 1776, building upon the momentum of the Great Awakening, and further magnified by clarity of intellect, profundity of knowledge, and revolutionary genius, a powerful combination of noble and great souls would come together in Philadelphia. Bound together in their love of freedom, this most remarkable generation of public men in history would deliver a compendium of self-evident truths, truths they regarded as “sacred and undeniable.”

Envisioning an empire of liberty traveling westward, they were looking forward to the destined moment when America would give the “law” to the rest of the world in fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah: “Out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” Pledging their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor, they would declare independence, affirm that “all men are created equal,” state that rights come from God, and enshrine in the American consciousness the supernal principle of consent of the governed.

Also in 1776, Adam Smith would publish The Wealth of Nations, which, through the invention of a market economy, would unleash a movement that would more profoundly revolutionize the world between 1800 and the present day than any other singe force. Defining freedom of thought as the most critical goal of the America Revolution, Thomas Jefferson would author the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, thus laying the groundwork for the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. And Edward Gibbon, seeking to answer the questions, “what happened, and could it happen again” would publish The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire.

Eleven years later, the Founding Fathers, led by George Washington, whose “very presence in Philadelphia certified the connection between the two founding moments: the first to win independence and the second to secure it” (Ellis), would give birth to the Constitution of the United States of America, “the most wonderful work ever struck off at a given time by the brain and purpose of man” (Gladstone). Basing their work on “just and holy principles,” the Framers would establish the foundation and legitimacy of our nation.

Meanwhile, on July 13, 1787, in New York, the Confederation Congress passed the Northwest Ordinance which protected civil liberties and outlawed slavery in the new territories. Simultaneously in Great Britain, William Wilberforce, in combination with other noble and great souls, began a determined effort to abolish the slave trade and then to abolish slavery itself in all English possessions.

As indicated in the small sampling of noble and great ones aforementioned, foreordination is the premortal selection of individuals to come forth in mortality at specified times, under certain conditions, and to fulfill predesignated responsibilities. In the totality of these few examples, through what they accomplished as individuals and in groups, as well as in the movements they led and supported, the discovery, colonization, and establishment of America was to be a significant part of “a marvelous work and a wonder,” as foretold by the Old Testament prophet Isaiah.

While “many Americans labor under the illusion that slavery was somehow a uniquely American evil, it was the Western world’s repudiation of slavery, only just beginning to build at the time of the American Revolution, which marked a dramatic sea change in moral sensibilities. The American Founders were living on the cusp of this change, in a manner that straddled two worlds” (1776 Report).

The Framers of America’s founding documents knew that slavery was incompatible with the idea that “all men are created equal.” Yet, in the formative years of the United States, there was insurmountable social, cultural, and political opposition in the fight to end human bondage in America.

Remarkably, on December 16, 1833, with the issue of slavery unresolved, the Prophet Joseph Smith quoted the Lord. Referring to one of the “just and holy principles” upon which this nation was founded, he wrote, “It is not right that any man should be in bondage one to another. And for this purpose have I established the Constitution of this land by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this very purpose, and redeemed the land by the shedding of blood” (DC 101.79-80).

In the fight against tyrannical practices, our history is one of common struggle and great achievement. Our ancestors won independence, created a government, and tamed a wilderness. In addition, over 600,000 lives were lost in the successful effort to end human bondage.

Interpreting the Declaration of Independence, Abraham Lincoln noted, “They meant to set up a standard maxim for free society, which should be familiar to all, and revered by all . . . and even though never perfectly attained, constantly approximated, and thereby constantly spreading and deepening its influence and augmenting the happiness and value of life to all people of all colors everywhere.”

Having based our political legitimacy on the eternal principles of liberty, justice, and consent of the governed, Thomas Jefferson was singled out by Lincoln, who wrote, “All honor to Jefferson–the man who, in the concrete pressure of a struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, forecast, and capacity to introduce in a merely revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times . . . a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of re-appearing tyranny and oppression.”

In their appeal to both reason and revelation, our founding documents speak to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” to the principle of freedom, and to the will of “We the People.” Working together, they are “an outgrowth, in practical terms, of man’s desire to protect the principle of free agency by defining the role and limits of civil authority” (G. Homer Durham).

Having established America as a city on a hill, those who came before brought forth eternal truths and a desire to share those truths with the rest of mankind. Under the protection of the Constitution of the United States, the spread of Christ’s gospel can go forward as the greatest motivational power in the world to be and to do good. Revealed as a trail of clues, our founding documents have given us the opportunity to establish and maintain a Republic, if we can keep it, and to offer universal peace and prosperity to all mankind, if they will receive it.

For additional information on America’s Grand Design, please see: http://www.americasgranddesign.com